Home » Copyright/Intellectual Property » How Your Harlem Shake Videos Make Money for the Original Artist

How Your Harlem Shake Videos Make Money for the Original Artist

22 February 2013

From Time:

The Harlem Shake, now two weeks into its life as America’s favorite (or most annoying) meme, has shown a surprising resilience in an age when most Internet jokes have a 24-hour shelf life. More than 4,000 videos featuring the words “Harlem Shake” were being posted per day to YouTube during the peak of the mania last week, and new versions continue to crop up. The primary element holding the videos together, which feature everything from dancing walruses to Power Rangers, is the song “Harlem Shake,” a hip-hop instrumental that sports a now-infamous beat drop about 15 seconds in. While the videos are simple fun for the thousands of people that have participated in Harlem Shakes, they’ve become an easy moneymaker for the song’s creator, Baauer, and YouTube itself.

Just a few years ago, copyright lawyers likely would have shut down the Harlem Shake craze before it could really get going.

. . . .

Through a service called Content ID, YouTube automatically trawls its servers looking for copies of copyrighted materials that owners have asked to be protected. Users of the service can then have these copies removed from YouTube, do nothing, or have ads sold against the videos if they qualify for monetization. When Baauer’s label, Mad Decent, originally uploaded the full “Harlem Shake” song to YouTube in the summer of 2012, they were hoping it would proliferate. “We’ve, from the beginning, been very much a proponent of allowing everybody to do whatever they want with our stuff, as long we’re able to monetize it,” says Jasper Goggins, the manager of the label. “It’s a great way to help spread the music.”

. . . .

Thanks to Content ID, Baauer was well positioned to immediately begin profiting when the Harlem Shake meme took off at the start of February. When the University of Georgia does the Harlem Shake underwater or a firefighter does it with a chicken, Baauer and his label get some of the ad revenue, as does YouTube. The people shooting the videos get no money because they are using copyrighted content. So far thousands of Harlem Shake videos totalling tens of millions of views have been claimed by the copyright owners in order to be monetized.

Link to the rest at Time

Copyright/Intellectual Property

6 Comments to “How Your Harlem Shake Videos Make Money for the Original Artist”

  1. This is what SHOULD happen: the artists get a cut.

    If the same could happen with pirated work, it would be perfect: discoverability AND a revenue stream. For the creator.

    • What about fanfic?

      • That’s what I was thinking–it would be neat if they could do something like this for fanfic. Plus if authors get revenue off fanfic, some of them might be less uptight about it.

      • I would probably be very intrigued by profiting via ads on fanfic. I’m less enthused about blurring the lines between authorized fanfic (see media tie-in novels, or shared-world anthologies such as the Valdemar and Darkover themed ones) and stray random fanfic for sale. I would be intrigued if authorized fanfic could be done, though — it would be very clever if one of the venues which allows self publishing (Amazon, I’m looking at you; you’ve got the grounding for this in the Audible.com reader/author setup, I bet)…

        Ahem. If one of them offered an option for an author to approve a given fic, for an established cut. The fic-author would enter the cut and price-range that they’d agreed on with the original-work author; the original-work author would also enter the same percentage and a price-range (no higher than X, no lower than Y), and thereafter, the difference would be split as stated. It would probably be a bit clunky and stilted, because there’d likely be a need to make either one of the parties able to cancel the work, but so long as the relationship between the two authors didn’t go horribly south, it would probably do fine.

        (Yes, a contract is supposed to protect people even if the relationship goes to Hades in a Reticule, but in the interests of swift and relatively automated, mutual-assured KABOOM might at least do the job… Authorized fanfic, monetized for both, isn’t something to enter into blindly. Fanfic politics can be scary.)

  2. Good on them.

  3. In case you’d like to glut yourself on Harlem Shake:

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.