The Thriller That Predicted the Russia Scandal

This content has been archived. It may no longer be accurate or relevant.

From Politico:

David Pepper recently had to block someone on Twitter for the first time in his life, because he was tired of being accused, repeatedly, of hiding his real identity as a Russian spy.

“If I were a Russian spy, would I really release my plot in novel form in advance?” the 46-year-old Cincinnatian asks me, mock-bewildered, on a recent Friday morning. “Then I wouldn’t be a very good spy.”

The online tormentor isn’t just throwing out random espionage allegations for no reason. He’s decided to go after Pepper because his first book—The People’s House, a quick, lively thriller full of labyrinthine scandal and homey Rust Belt touches—reads like a user’s guide to the last two years in U.S. politics.

And Pepper wrote the book before any of it actually happened.

The People’s House centers around a Russian scheme to flip an election and put Republicans in power by depressing votes in the Midwest. Pipeline politics play an unexpectedly outsize role. Sexual harassment and systematic coverups in Congress abound. But it’s no unimaginative rehash. Pepper released the book in the summer of 2016, just as the presidential contest between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton was heating up—and before Russia’s real-life campaign to influence the election had been revealed. In fact, the heart of the story had been written for three years when Russian government sent hackers to infiltrate the Democratic National Committee and sent their trolls to influence the election on social media. The Putin-like oligarch Pepper portrays as pulling the strings of U.S. politics had been fleshed out for two.

Using a self-publishing service, Pepper didn’t expect much of a reception, and he didn’t get one at first, beyond his amused friends and colleagues. But when a Wall Street Journal reviewer that November surprised him by calling The People’s House “a sleeper candidate for political thriller of the year,” that started to change.

. . . .

As he waited for edits on the first book, early in 2016, Pepper got started on a sequel, The Wingman. He finished the bulk of the manuscript by January 2017, as Trump was getting sworn in. Now, one year into Trump’s tenure, his second offering in the otherwise dull world of political thrillers—which comes out on Monday—is an equally complex tale of kompromat influencing a presidential election, even more sexual misconduct, and an Erik Prince-like military contractor with close ties to the administration, this time told through the lens of a rollicking Democratic presidential primary. He wrote it before the now-infamous Steele dossier became public knowledge (and before, Pepper says, he learned about it)and months before revelations about the Blackwater founder’s close ties to the Trump team and its Russian entanglements. If the first parallels were eerie, these ones were, Pepper admits, maybe even spooky.

. . . .

The key to writing a successful political thriller is to come up with a scenario that’s far-fetched enough to stretch the reader’s imagination, but not so insane as to be wholly unbelievable. Two years ago, a successful Russian plot to throw an American election by manipulating the Midwest would almost certainly fall into the latter category. So might the idea of systematic blackmail of a presidential candidate.

Link to the rest at Politico

8 thoughts on “The Thriller That Predicted the Russia Scandal”

    • Minnesota, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin–all reliably blue states. Depending on whether you roll the Great Plains and Missouri into the Midwest, the only reliably red state in the region is Indiana.

    • If it suppresses it in Milwaukee and Detroit it helps a lot.

      The divide isn’t by state but rather big city vs everybody else. Just look at the continual secession efforts in California, trying to cut loose from coastal domination.

      Very different interests and cultures.

  1. I read the book sample, and ordered the book. The next book will come out Monday.

    The only flaw I see, is that I had to order the paper book through a third party, not Amazon’s service. He needs to transition to Kindle paper or CreateSpace to keep making money on the first book in paper.

  2. what’s funny about the 2016 is that “House of Cards” predicted a canny American politician would steal the election, not Russia.

    I mean, HoC got the story about 90% right; it’s just that they got the primary manipulator wrong (and understandably so, given that they wanted to tell Underwood’s story).

  3. It’s funny, but all the actual evidence points to collusion between the dems and the Russians, not the other way around. Considering the abysmal foreign policy of the last 8 years I think the last thing the Russians would want is a Republican in power. But hey, never let the truth get in the way of a lie.

Comments are closed.