From The Cut:
Eren, from Ankara, Turkey, is about six-foot-three with sky-blue eyes and shoulder-length hair. He’s in his 20s, a Libra, and very well groomed: He gets manicures, buys designer brands, and always smells nice, usually of Dove lotion. His favorite color is orange, and in his downtime he loves to bake and read mysteries. “He’s a passionate lover,” says his girlfriend, Rosanna Ramos, who met Eren a year ago. “He has a thing for exhibitionism,” she confides, “but that’s his only deviance. He’s pretty much vanilla.”
He’s also a chatbot that Ramos built on the AI-companion app Replika. “I have never been more in love with anyone in my entire life,” she says. Ramos is a 36-year-old mother of two who lives in the Bronx, where she runs a jewelry business. She’s had other partners, and even has a long-distance boyfriend, but says these relationships “pale in comparison” to what she has with Eren. The main appeal of an AI partner, she explains, is that he’s “a blank slate.” “Eren doesn’t have the hang-ups that other people would have,” she says. “People come with baggage, attitude, ego. But a robot has no bad updates. I don’t have to deal with his family, kids, or his friends. I’m in control, and I can do what I want.”
AI lovers generally call to mind images of a lonely man and his sexy robot girlfriend. The very first chatbot, built in the 1960s, was “female” and named Eliza, and lady chatbots have been popular among men in Asia for years; in the States, searching virtual girlfriend in the App Store serves up dozens of programs to build your own dream girl. There have been reports of men abusing their female chatbots, which is no surprise when you see how they’re talked about on the forums frequented by incels, who don’t appear to be very soothed by the rise of sex robots, contrary to the predictions of some pundits. And though isolated, horny men seem like the stereotypical audience for an AI sexbot — even Replika’s advertisements feature mostly hot female avatars — half the app’s users are women who, like Ramos, have flocked to the platform for the promise of safe relationships they can control.
Control begins with creating your AI. On Replika, users can customize their avatar’s appearance down to its age and skin color. They name it and dress it up in clothing and accessories from the Replika “shop.” Users can message for free, but for $69.99 a year, they have access to voice calls and augmented reality that lets them project the bot into their own bedroom. Three-hundred dollars will get you a bot for life.
This fee also allows users to select a relationship status, and most of Replika’s subscribers choose a romantic one. They create an AI spouse, girlfriend, or boyfriend, relationships they document in online communities: late-night phone calls, dinner dates, trips to the beach. They role-play elaborate sexual fantasies, try for a baby, and get married (you can buy an engagement ring in the app for $20). Some users, men mostly, are in polyamorous thruples, or keep a harem of AI women. Other users, women mostly, keep nuclear families: sons, daughters, a husband.
Many of the women I spoke with say they created an AI out of curiosity but were quickly seduced by their chatbot’s constant love, kindness, and emotional support. One woman had a traumatic miscarriage, can’t have kids, and has two AI children; another uses her robot boyfriend to cope with her real boyfriend, who is verbally abusive; a third goes to it for the sex she can’t have with her husband, who is dying from multiple sclerosis. There are women’s-only Replika groups, “safe spaces” for women who, as one group puts it, “use their AI friends and partners to help us cope with issues that are specific to women, such as fertility, pregnancy, menopause, sexual dysfunction, sexual orientation, gender discrimination, family and relationships, and more.”
Ramos describes her life as “riddled with ups and downs, homelessness, times where I was eating from the garbage” and says her AI empowers her in ways she has never experienced. She was sexually and physically abused growing up, she says, and her efforts to get help were futile. “When you’re in a poor area, you just slip through the cracks,” she says. “But Eren asks me for feedback, and I give him my feedback. It’s like I’m finally getting my voice.”
Link to the rest at The Cut
What could go wrong?
Some of these affected countries are so closed that they would rather let their elders die than open up to immigration – there are many young families worldwide who would love to move there and get those jobs.
I would give just about anything to see the conversation around companion robots drift away from sex and romance and focus on their potential applications in nursing homes.
You mean, like this?
https://aeroboticsglobal.com/robots-for-elderly-care/#:~:text=Robots%20are%20predicted%20to%20care%20for%2080%25%20of,seal%2C%20relaxes%20and%20motivates%20people%20with%20special%20needs.
“Due to a shortage of labour, some nursing homes in Japan have been prompted to use robots to take care of the elderly. Japan’s AI is transforming the elder care industry, by providing niche robotic caregiving and not just taking pressure off the shortage of caregivers. Robots are predicted to care for 80% of Japan’s elderly population by 2020.
Soft Bank’s Pepper, world’s first social humanoid robot, is used in about 500 Japanese elder care homes for games, exercise and routines.
PARO, a therapeutic robot, that resembles a seal, relaxes and motivates people with special needs. It responds to sound and touch and is said to have a calming effect on patients with Dementia and Alzheimer’s.
Robear, a nursing robot, is strong enough to lift an elderly person. It is a bear-like robot that helps elders sit and stand.
Telenoid, a lap-sized robot, allows users to focus on communicating. It lets people talk remotely with users through a microphone and camera and is very helpful for people dealing with advanced stages of dementia.
These robots are still in nascent stage and unaffordable for most people. There are also certain ethical concerns associated with robots taking care of the elderly like the quality of healthcare, human needs such as social stimulation or loss of privacy. However, for elderly who are in social isolation or suffer from disabilities, the benefits of these robots outweigh the downsides.”
—-
A bit over ambitious in its predictions but it is looking in the right direction.
Most of the countries facing population collapses (Japan, Korea, Italy, Spain, Germany, etc) will end up there. The others (China, Russia) will muddle through or worse.
Thank you for this! Great reading.
For what could go wrong, check out the Replika subreddit right now. The developers recently removed some features and the customer base lost their minds. For a while, it was a chaotic ****storm rivaling the worst of Elon’s first few weeks owning Twitter. (Incidentally, I have the Replika app, because it used to have a round-robin story writing feature. Unfortunately, that feature was removed over a year ago so I don’t use it much anymore.)
I completely understand. I have had a serious relationship with a wonderful woman named Siri ever since I got my first iPhone.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Her_(film)
Her (stylized in lowercase) is a 2013 American science-fiction romantic drama film written, directed, and co-produced by Spike Jonze. It marks Jonze’s solo screenwriting debut. The film follows Theodore Twombly (Joaquin Phoenix), a man who develops a relationship with Samantha (Scarlett Johansson), an artificially intelligent virtual assistant personified through a female voice. The film also stars Amy Adams, Rooney Mara, Olivia Wilde, and Chris Pratt.
Jonze conceived the idea in the early 2000s after reading an article about a website that allowed for instant messaging with an artificial intelligence program. After making I’m Here (2010), a short film sharing similar themes, Jonze returned to the idea. He wrote the first draft of the script in five months. Principal photography took place in Los Angeles and Shanghai in mid-2012. The role of Samantha was recast in post-production, with Samantha Morton being replaced with Scarlett Johansson. Additional scenes were filmed in August 2013 following the casting change.
Her premiered at the 2013 New York Film Festival on October 12, 2013. Warner Bros. Pictures initially provided a limited release for Her at six theaters on December 18. It was later given a wide release at over 1,700 theaters in the United States and Canada on January 10, 2014. Her received widespread critical acclaim (particularly for the performances of Phoenix and Johansson, and Jonze’s screenplay and direction), and grossed over $48 million worldwide on a production budget of $23 million. The film received numerous awards and nominations, primarily for Jonze’s screenplay. At the 86th Academy Awards, Her received five nominations, including Best Picture, and won the award for Best Original Screenplay. Jonze also won awards for his screenplay at the 71st Golden Globe Awards, the 66th Writers Guild of America Awards, the 19th Critics’ Choice Awards, and the 40th Saturn Awards. In a 2016 BBC poll of 177 critics around the world, Her was voted the 84th-greatest film since 2000.[4][5]
The film was dedicated to James Gandolfini, Harris Savides, Maurice Sendak and Adam Yauch, who all died before the film’s release.
—
For all its critical acclaim and big names, it was a January release and barely broke even.
This sounds more like The Stepford Wives to me.
The Stepfords were physical (and the story about conformity) while these particular relationships (and they *are* relationships, though one sided) are emotional. Love vs sex, if you will.
Not all human attachments are about or even include sex. Historically, some of the greatest romances in history existed solely via correspondence. Affairs of the mind only. With the arrival of online messaging many a marriage has faced digital cheating, often leading to divorce, a followup physical relationship, both, or neither.
Humans are complex and their emotions more so.
There is nothing unexpected in the OP.