Exploring Amazon with Data Guy

27 March 2017

The DataGuy portion of the podcast begins at about the 9:00 point.

Thanks to Karen and others for the tip.

Amazon Bricks & Mortar

16 March 2017

Thanks to Alexis for the tip.

‘Homo Deus’ Author Yuval Noah Harari Says Authority Shifting from People to AI

13 March 2017

Not exactly about the writing business, but certainly about a couple of interesting, albeit overpriced, books.

From The Wall Street Journal:

Yuval Noah Harari’s “Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind,” became a best-selling book after it was first published in 2011. He argued that people dominate life on earth because they are the only animals that can cooperate in very large groups. Such mass cooperation only became possible, he says, with the emergence of myth, in which many people believe in the same thing, regardless of whether it is a religion, a nation or an economic system or corporation.

His latest work, “Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow,” published in 2017, dwells on what he believes to be the next stage of human development. Having learned to manage famine and war, he says people need a new challenge. He foresees an era in which authority shifts from humans and their myths to data and algorithms. In the foreseeable future, he argues, algorithms well may become so powerful that we will be able to program people just as we program computers, creating a superhuman species, “Homo Deus.” People might use this power to use in any number of ways, he argues. He says he wrote “Homo Deus” to spark a productive conversation about those choices.

. . . .

How much of the disorder that you see stems from technology?

For example if millions of people, especially in developing countries, lose their low-skill jobs in areas like the textile industry, because of the rise of new technologies, then we will see much more impact on political developments and also more and more influence on the ways the conflicts actually are managed.

. . . .

I imagine AI makes it easier for a smaller entity with few people to exert control and that masses of people become obsolete in a way? Does this prefigure where the rest of us are headed?

Yes. For all the talk of job loss and the impact of technology, one of the best places to look today is the military. It is a few steps ahead of the civilian economy. And what people are predicting for the civilian economy in 30 years is actually happening in the armed forces today. The armies rely on small numbers of highly professional super warriors and on sophisticated and autonomous technologies. I am not saying the civilian economy will happen in exactly the same way, but it is good testing ground for what might happen in the civilian economy.

You think people and technology will merge in a way, create literally or figuratively a new species, and that this new species, Homo Deus, is superhuman. We won’t all have super human powers but some of us will and the rest of us may become less and les relevant?

The basic insight is that nothing is deterministic. Technology is going to evolve. But the social and political outcomes are not deterministic. Just as in the 20th Century you could use electricity to build a communist dictatorship or a democracy, so in the 21st Century we have choices.

…Now one of the most important questions in the world, is who owns the data of humankind. Maybe the most important asset in the 21st Century is not land, and it’s not money, it’s really data. This is the basis for everything. And we are now accumulating the data to decipher humanity, and to change humanity, data about human behavior and even more importantly the human body.

When it comes to questions of mind, we are far less certain. Our understanding of mind is very limited and very poor.

AI will outperform humans in more and more tasks. This I think is almost a certainty. And it will not take a long time. When it comes to questions of mind, there we are far less certain where we are heading because our understanding of mind is very limited and very poor. One school of thought says that essentially minds work on the basis of electrochemical reactions in the brain, and that if we accumulate enough data on the brain, and enough computing power, we can hack humans in the same way as we hack computers. And once this happens you can start creating direct brain-computer interfaces and once you do that, you can connect several brains together into an inter-brain net, so I can access your memories … Now, personally I am skeptical about this particular idea because I think we are far from understanding the mind. But I know there are a lot of very serious people in places like Silicon Valley that think this can happen in 20, 40, 60 years. They even talk about uploading human minds into computers and so forth. As a historian, I say okay. I am just reporting that there are people who think this. But they are very serious people and they have billions of dollars invested in this.

Link to the rest at The Wall Street Journal (Link may expire)


UPS Drones

21 February 2017

Romance novels: One of publishing’s hottest trends

13 February 2017

Two Alexas

27 January 2017

A Series of Unfortunate Events

11 January 2017

The Big Freeze

9 January 2017

Nothing to do with books, but many parts of the US are experiencing severe winter weather.

The following film was created in 1965 and features British rail workers during “The Big Freeze” of 1962-63, one of the UK’s coldest winters.


La Vie en rose

27 December 2016

For reasons unbeknownst to him, PG started thinking about La Vie en rose.

The song was, of course, the signature of French singer Édith Piaf and she popularized it not long after the end of World War II. Piaf wrote the lyrics and melody herself. The title is variously translated as “Life in Rosy Hues” or “Life Through Rose-Tinted Glasses”; its literal meaning is “Life in Pink”.

Other singers have covered Piaf’s song.

While no one can beat Piaf, Louis Armstrong has a lovely version.



Here are the English lyrics in the Louis Armstrong version:

Hold me close and hold me fast
The magic spell you cast
This is la vie en rose

When you kiss me heaven sighs
And though I close my eyes
I see la vie en rose

When you press me to your heart
I’m in a world apart
A world where roses bloom

And when you speak…angels sing from above
Everyday words seem…to turn into love songs

Give your heart and soul to me
And life will always be
La vie en rose


Here’s a modern version by San Francisco Bay area musicians Laura & Anton.


And the incomparable Ms. Piaf

‘Whatever’ tops most annoying words of 2016, while a younger crowd doesn’t care for ‘I can’t even’

23 December 2016

From The Washington Post:

Dictionaries have already given us their year-end words. 2016 was the year of “surreal,” Merriam-Webster announced recently, rounding out a collection that included “paranoid” from Cambridge Dictionary, “post-truth” from the Oxford Dictionaries and “xenophobia” from And now the American people, or at least a group of 1,005 polled by the Marist Institute for Public Opinion, have declared their most annoying words of 2016.

The winner, for the eighth year running, was “whatever.” “Whatever” ground the gears of 38 percent of people polled, Marist reported Wednesday.

People can use the word “whatever” benignly. As a pronoun, it indicates a lack of restrictions or “regardless of what,” per the Oxford Dictionary, or as an adverb emphasizing “at all.”

But among its most irritating contexts is the flippant “whatever,” signifying nothing but indifference. The 1995 film “Clueless” — complete with a gesture of touched thumbs and splayed index fingers to form a W — may lay claim to the most famous on-screen “whatever.” The slang term appeared at least four decades earlier in a 1965 episode of “Bewitched,” in which one character responds to another with an “All right, whatever.”

Link to the rest at The Washington Post and thanks to Felix for the tip.


Next Page »